Monday, August 5, 2019

LORENZO M. TAÑADA, ET AL. vs. HON. JUAN C. TUVERA, in his capacity as Executive Assistant to the President, ET AL


G.R. No. L-63915 April 24, 1985

Publication Requirement for a Law to be Effective

Facts: Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus to compel respondent public officials to cause the publication in the Official Gazette of various presidential decrees, letters of instructions, general orders, proclamations, executive orders, letter of implementation and administrative orders.

Respondents contend that publication in the Official Gazette is not a sine qua non requirement for the effectivity of laws where the laws themselves provide for their own effectivity dates. It is submitted that since the presidential issuances in question contain special provisions as to the date they are to take effect, publication in the Official Gazette is not indispensable for their effectivity. The point stressed is anchored on Article 2 of the Civil Code:
Art. 2. Laws shall take effect after fifteen days following the completion of their publication in the Official Gazette, unless it is otherwise provided, ...

Issue: Whether publication in the Official Gazette is an indispensable requirement for the effectivity of the laws?

Held: Yes. Respondents' argument is logically correct only insofar as it equates the effectivity of laws with the fact of publication. Considered in the light of other statutes applicable to the issue at hand, Article 2 does not preclude the requirement of publication in the Official Gazette, even if the law itself provides for the date of its effectivity. Without such notice and publication, there would be no basis for the application of the maxim "ignorantia legis non excusat." It would be the height of injustice to punish or otherwise burden a citizen for the transgression of a law of which he had no notice whatsoever, not even a constructive one.

WHEREFORE, the Court hereby orders respondents to publish in the Official Gazette all unpublished presidential issuances which are of general application, and unless so published, they shall have no binding force and effect.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Kawayan Hills Corporation vs. CA

Kawayan Hills Corporation vs. CA     G.R. No. 203090, September 05, 2018 Leonen, J      Kawayan Hills is a domestic corporation dealing with...